l***@hotmail.com
2006-09-28 09:55:42 UTC
Yet another Commission (needless to say chaired by an alien) has been
set up to report on why 'multiculturalism' has failed and recommend
measures to 'promote social cohesion'.
We know already that, like the others, it will propose increased
pressure on the indigenous population to give ground to the alien
intruders and accept even more 'positive discrimination'. Another
foregone conclusion is that it will demand even more of the
taxpayers' money as insurance against alien violence.
It so happens that much of my own working life entailed giving senior
public service officials some blinding glimpses of the obvious. Of
course, some of them later tried to pretend they weren't taken by
surprise, while others tended to the attitude 'I didn't get where I
am today by taking advice from social inferiors'. Ah well, the
habit is hard to break, so I'll take this opportunity to do the same
for the worthies assigned to the above-mentioned Commission. They
should fasten their seat-belts now.
* The British people have never and will never accept the invasion
of their homeland by hordes of alien opportunists.
* The only culture we're interested in is our own, simply
because it has proved manifestly superior to any other. (Why else
would so many aliens want to take advantage of it?)
* Any marginal curiosity about alien 'cultures' is adequately
catered for by television, libraries and travel agents.
* While most British natives are all too aware of the damaging
consequences, we have yet to experience any positive benefits arising
from the Third World invasion.
* Supporters of this invasion are invariably left-wing renegades
mired in 'post-colonial guilt' and favouring a mongrel world under
a supra-national government.
* Imposition of the infamous Race Acts itself testifies to the
fact that the native British have never agreed to the alien invasion
and would therefore do nothing voluntarily to facilitate it. This fact
constitutes what the disaffected and unwelcome intruders and
Establishment renegades choose to call 'institutional racism'; a
charge they could retrospectively apply to King Alfred's warriors,
Drake's seamen and the Battle of Britain squadrons.
* We have therefore a right and a duty to frustrate all such
dictatorial measures imposed by a renegade government. Anything less
would be a betrayal of all those who sacrificed everything to save
Britain for the British on many occasions in our nation's history.
* A defining feature of any alleged culture is a continuing drive
to expand its power and influence in human affairs, at whatever cost to
its rivals. (What else inspires the Muslim terrorists?) Thus
'multi-culturalism' is patently incompatible with social cohesion,
and threatens racial and national survival.
* The first duty of any government is to secure the country
against invasion and /or foreign domination. It therefore follows that
complicity of the government in surrendering the territory and
government of our homeland to alien invaders and the European Union
amounts to treason as that term has always been understood.
* Britain was regarded as over-populated by eminent economists
even in the 1950s; so Third World immigrants have grossly exacerbated
socio-economic problems merely by their numbers, quite apart from their
adverse racial and religious proclivities.
* It follows from the above that an unequivocal commitment to
repatriation of unwanted immigrants and exit from the European Union is
the sine qua non of British politics.
* Loyalty and discrimination are inseparable sides of the same
moral and political coinage; i.e. you can't have one without the
other. So-called anti-discrimination laws are thus by their very
nature disloyal; that is to say, treacherous.
* The renegade government has imported Muslim terrorism to
Britain. Such terrorism will remain so long as Muslims swarm in our
towns and cities and infiltrate our police, security and other public
services. Meanwhile, under the guise of 'security measures', the
government seeks to tighten its grip on a native population growing
increasingly restive with the consequences of government treachery on
immigration.
* 'Racist' is a term of abuse only used by aliens and
renegades to intimidate patriots.
* There has been much recent talk (mostly among renegades) about
how to define 'national identity'. We are of course defined by our
genetic and cultural inheritance, not by renegade diktat. Britain is
the homeland of the British race, itself a compound of Anglo-Saxon,
Viking and Celtic peoples with many centuries of shared history and
traditions.
* All of nature and evolution demonstrates that any species which
fails to preserve its own exclusive territory is doomed to extinction
by predators and parasites of one kind or another. Human society is no
exception: race is therefore the fundamental religion, and the nation
is its church.. Thus racial nationalism accords with nature and
evolution, whereas indiscriminate 'inclusiveness' is a political
perversity and doomed to fail.
* It follows from all of the above that forced cohabitation of
disparate races is the political equivalent of rape so far as the
indigenous population is concerned.
* The Race Acts therefore amount to the same thing as penalising
the rape victim for resisting.
* Aliens and renegades are therefore not entitled to and will not
get cooperation from the loyal population of Britain. That fact will
continue to frustrate renegade legislation. And alien attempts to
ingratiate themselves or, failing this, to threaten violent disorder
unless their demands are met, will get the response they deserve. So
all these government enquiries into the multi-culti failure are merely
a device to buy a little more time before the days of reckoning arrive.
The foregoing should be enough for the multi-culti brigade to choke on.
Some may dismiss it as bigoted right-wing extremism. As to that, the
author is one of five sons who all served in the armed forces like
their father, and with four sisters who married servicemen. Along with
their numerous offspring they have been good citizens who worked hard
for a living, had no criminal record, begged nobody's favours and did
not suffer hypocrites, parasites and fools gladly. So if that's the
stuff of fascism and bigotry, then most reasonable people would say we
need more of it.
F Kimbal Johnson
September 2006
set up to report on why 'multiculturalism' has failed and recommend
measures to 'promote social cohesion'.
We know already that, like the others, it will propose increased
pressure on the indigenous population to give ground to the alien
intruders and accept even more 'positive discrimination'. Another
foregone conclusion is that it will demand even more of the
taxpayers' money as insurance against alien violence.
It so happens that much of my own working life entailed giving senior
public service officials some blinding glimpses of the obvious. Of
course, some of them later tried to pretend they weren't taken by
surprise, while others tended to the attitude 'I didn't get where I
am today by taking advice from social inferiors'. Ah well, the
habit is hard to break, so I'll take this opportunity to do the same
for the worthies assigned to the above-mentioned Commission. They
should fasten their seat-belts now.
* The British people have never and will never accept the invasion
of their homeland by hordes of alien opportunists.
* The only culture we're interested in is our own, simply
because it has proved manifestly superior to any other. (Why else
would so many aliens want to take advantage of it?)
* Any marginal curiosity about alien 'cultures' is adequately
catered for by television, libraries and travel agents.
* While most British natives are all too aware of the damaging
consequences, we have yet to experience any positive benefits arising
from the Third World invasion.
* Supporters of this invasion are invariably left-wing renegades
mired in 'post-colonial guilt' and favouring a mongrel world under
a supra-national government.
* Imposition of the infamous Race Acts itself testifies to the
fact that the native British have never agreed to the alien invasion
and would therefore do nothing voluntarily to facilitate it. This fact
constitutes what the disaffected and unwelcome intruders and
Establishment renegades choose to call 'institutional racism'; a
charge they could retrospectively apply to King Alfred's warriors,
Drake's seamen and the Battle of Britain squadrons.
* We have therefore a right and a duty to frustrate all such
dictatorial measures imposed by a renegade government. Anything less
would be a betrayal of all those who sacrificed everything to save
Britain for the British on many occasions in our nation's history.
* A defining feature of any alleged culture is a continuing drive
to expand its power and influence in human affairs, at whatever cost to
its rivals. (What else inspires the Muslim terrorists?) Thus
'multi-culturalism' is patently incompatible with social cohesion,
and threatens racial and national survival.
* The first duty of any government is to secure the country
against invasion and /or foreign domination. It therefore follows that
complicity of the government in surrendering the territory and
government of our homeland to alien invaders and the European Union
amounts to treason as that term has always been understood.
* Britain was regarded as over-populated by eminent economists
even in the 1950s; so Third World immigrants have grossly exacerbated
socio-economic problems merely by their numbers, quite apart from their
adverse racial and religious proclivities.
* It follows from the above that an unequivocal commitment to
repatriation of unwanted immigrants and exit from the European Union is
the sine qua non of British politics.
* Loyalty and discrimination are inseparable sides of the same
moral and political coinage; i.e. you can't have one without the
other. So-called anti-discrimination laws are thus by their very
nature disloyal; that is to say, treacherous.
* The renegade government has imported Muslim terrorism to
Britain. Such terrorism will remain so long as Muslims swarm in our
towns and cities and infiltrate our police, security and other public
services. Meanwhile, under the guise of 'security measures', the
government seeks to tighten its grip on a native population growing
increasingly restive with the consequences of government treachery on
immigration.
* 'Racist' is a term of abuse only used by aliens and
renegades to intimidate patriots.
* There has been much recent talk (mostly among renegades) about
how to define 'national identity'. We are of course defined by our
genetic and cultural inheritance, not by renegade diktat. Britain is
the homeland of the British race, itself a compound of Anglo-Saxon,
Viking and Celtic peoples with many centuries of shared history and
traditions.
* All of nature and evolution demonstrates that any species which
fails to preserve its own exclusive territory is doomed to extinction
by predators and parasites of one kind or another. Human society is no
exception: race is therefore the fundamental religion, and the nation
is its church.. Thus racial nationalism accords with nature and
evolution, whereas indiscriminate 'inclusiveness' is a political
perversity and doomed to fail.
* It follows from all of the above that forced cohabitation of
disparate races is the political equivalent of rape so far as the
indigenous population is concerned.
* The Race Acts therefore amount to the same thing as penalising
the rape victim for resisting.
* Aliens and renegades are therefore not entitled to and will not
get cooperation from the loyal population of Britain. That fact will
continue to frustrate renegade legislation. And alien attempts to
ingratiate themselves or, failing this, to threaten violent disorder
unless their demands are met, will get the response they deserve. So
all these government enquiries into the multi-culti failure are merely
a device to buy a little more time before the days of reckoning arrive.
The foregoing should be enough for the multi-culti brigade to choke on.
Some may dismiss it as bigoted right-wing extremism. As to that, the
author is one of five sons who all served in the armed forces like
their father, and with four sisters who married servicemen. Along with
their numerous offspring they have been good citizens who worked hard
for a living, had no criminal record, begged nobody's favours and did
not suffer hypocrites, parasites and fools gladly. So if that's the
stuff of fascism and bigotry, then most reasonable people would say we
need more of it.
F Kimbal Johnson
September 2006