Privatised police arrive on the street

[Old Boy]

A radical change in the way we police Britain has sneaked in below the
radar over the past 18 months. In a series of Home Office initiatives
designed to add manpower with particular skills or knowledge to the
regular police force, six new groups of privately sponsored police have
been introduced into the Met and are being deployed in a number of the
provincial forces.

Although they belong to the part-time, normally unpaid branch of the
police - the so-called 'special constables' - there is a big
difference: their time and training is paid for by private sector
employers who agree to loan them to the police for 200 hours a year.

http://www.thefirstpost.co.uk/index.php?menuID=1&subID=925

[bongo]

Post by Old Boy
A radical change in the way we police Britain has sneaked in below the
radar over the past 18 months. In a series of Home Office initiatives
designed to add manpower with particular skills or knowledge to the
regular police force, six new groups of privately sponsored police have
been introduced into the Met and are being deployed in a number of the
provincial forces.
Although they belong to the part-time, normally unpaid branch of the
police - the so-called 'special constables' - there is a big
difference: their time and training is paid for by private sector
employers who agree to loan them to the police for 200 hours a year.
http://www.thefirstpost.co.uk/index.php?menuID=1&subID=925

this part says alot
"I cannot see how a police officer can easily retain his or her independence
when their salaries are being paid by Dixons or Woolworth's."

[Dr Zoidberg]

Post by bongo

Post by Old Boy
A radical change in the way we police Britain has sneaked in below
the radar over the past 18 months. In a series of Home Office
initiatives designed to add manpower with particular skills or
knowledge to the regular police force, six new groups of privately
sponsored police have been introduced into the Met and are being
deployed in a number of the provincial forces.
Although they belong to the part-time, normally unpaid branch of the
police - the so-called 'special constables' - there is a big
difference: their time and training is paid for by private sector
employers who agree to loan them to the police for 200 hours a year.
http://www.thefirstpost.co.uk/index.php?menuID=1&subID=925

this part says alot
"I cannot see how a police officer can easily retain his or her
independence when their salaries are being paid by Dixons or
Woolworth's."

It's been common practice for decades for police costs to be paid by various
companies when they are needed above and beyond what is usual.
Think of large outdoor events , football matches , etc , etc.

In all these situations the overtime is effectively paid for by a third
party but that isn't seen as a conflict of interest

[Van Helsing]

Post by Dr Zoidberg

Post by bongo
this part says alot
"I cannot see how a police officer can easily retain his or her
independence when their salaries are being paid by Dixons or
Woolworth's."

It's been common practice for decades for police costs to be paid by various
companies when they are needed above and beyond what is usual.
Think of large outdoor events , football matches , etc , etc.
In all these situations the overtime is effectively paid for by a third
party but that isn't seen as a conflict of interest

I doubt the money from football clubs goes directly to the pockets of
the police officers involved, nor do the police officers exchange their
uniforms for football kit & run out onto the pitch to play.


VH

[Steve O]

Post by Dr Zoidberg

Post by bongo
this part says alot
"I cannot see how a police officer can easily retain his or her
independence when their salaries are being paid by Dixons or
Woolworth's."

It's been common practice for decades for police costs to be paid by
various companies when they are needed above and beyond what is usual.
Think of large outdoor events , football matches , etc , etc.
In all these situations the overtime is effectively paid for by a third
party but that isn't seen as a conflict of interest

I doubt the money from football clubs goes directly to the pockets of the
police officers involved,

Actually, it does in my area
Officers policing football matches in their own time aree paid at private
cost.

nor do the police officers exchange their uniforms for football kit & run
out onto the pitch to play.

I wish ;-)

[Martin Milan]

Post by bongo

Post by Old Boy
A radical change in the way we police Britain has sneaked in below the
radar over the past 18 months. In a series of Home Office initiatives
designed to add manpower with particular skills or knowledge to the
regular police force, six new groups of privately sponsored police
have been introduced into the Met and are being deployed in a number
of the provincial forces.
Although they belong to the part-time, normally unpaid branch of the
police - the so-called 'special constables' - there is a big
difference: their time and training is paid for by private sector
employers who agree to loan them to the police for 200 hours a year.
http://www.thefirstpost.co.uk/index.php?menuID=1&subID=925

this part says alot
"I cannot see how a police officer can easily retain his or her
independence when their salaries are being paid by Dixons or
Woolworth's."

That's an argument you might have against any special constable, or
indeed any married one...

Martin.

[Steve Walker]

Post by Martin Milan

Post by bongo
this part says alot
"I cannot see how a police officer can easily retain his or her
independence when their salaries are being paid by Dixons or
Woolworth's."

That's an argument you might have against any special constable, or
indeed any married one...

I disagree. A person might be a special or a forces reservist, or indeed a
St John's Ambulancer, and their employer grants them some time off as a
civic gesture - that's fine & dandy.

In this case however, employers are nominating and sponsoring their staff to
obtain the powers of a constable, having presumably identified
business/profit advantages which they can gain from this. It dangerously
blurs the line of acountability and motivation, in my respectful view.

[Martin Milan]

Post by Steve Walker

Post by Martin Milan

Post by bongo
this part says alot
"I cannot see how a police officer can easily retain his or her
independence when their salaries are being paid by Dixons or
Woolworth's."

That's an argument you might have against any special constable, or
indeed any married one...

I disagree. A person might be a special or a forces reservist, or
indeed a St John's Ambulancer, and their employer grants them some
time off as a civic gesture - that's fine & dandy.
In this case however, employers are nominating and sponsoring their
staff to obtain the powers of a constable, having presumably
identified business/profit advantages which they can gain from this.
It dangerously blurs the line of acountability and motivation, in my
respectful view.

My point being that most special constables are employed by someone
else, and that this might be argued to have an effect on their
independence.

[a***@white-eagle.invalid.uk]

Post by Steve Walker

Post by Martin Milan

Post by bongo
this part says alot
"I cannot see how a police officer can easily retain his or her
independence when their salaries are being paid by Dixons or
Woolworth's."

That's an argument you might have against any special constable, or
indeed any married one...

I disagree. A person might be a special or a forces reservist, or indeed a
St John's Ambulancer, and their employer grants them some time off as a
civic gesture - that's fine & dandy.
In this case however, employers are nominating and sponsoring their staff to
obtain the powers of a constable, having presumably identified
business/profit advantages which they can gain from this. It dangerously
blurs the line of acountability and motivation, in my respectful view.

It is incredibly so. Do not people understand that while ordinary
shop staff can only legally arrest in the full knowledge that a
crime has been committed, than a constable can arrest on mere
suspicion?

The next move will be that these store police can carry guns! This is
not a joke... it happens in many countries.

Axel

[m.kellett]

You should first be aware that the Judicial Oath sworn by all UK judges and
magistrates only to Queen Elizabeth II is a fraud of massive proportions. UK
judges, barristers etc are illegaly, under international law, being
protected by Crown immunity. UK law does not apply to all despite what we
are told. These matters are top level crime at work.

My name is Joe Stirling and I want to sue The Freemasons. I have evidence of
Masonic persecution going back some 28 years. I have video evidence, digital
photos, voice recordings, nuisance calls, a daily diary for approx. 16 years
with dates, times and nature of calls/events. I also have years of research
that has all now fallen into place and can expose this extreme evil. I/we
also have numerous other victims with proof.

I am deadly serious and can back up everything I say. (I will even take the
truth drug, no problem)

Does anyone know a humanitarian lawyer who can help me take this to a
non-Masonic environment?

I want to sue and when I win, every penny will go towards all victims. This
is not just about me.

Under the Freedom Of Information act, why can't we have a public register of
members of Freemasonry?
Do they have something to hide? you bet. Secrecy = Lies

You have to stop/ban these secret societies from practicing. We, as an
affiliated group, can prove overwhelmingly that The Freemasons are the
psychological terrorists/ gangstalking/mobbing/injustice who do the dirty
work for their masters, the Illuminati/NWO, etc. If you get rid of the evil
Masonic foot-soldiers, then the rich/elite/greedy/selfish destroyers of
society will have no protection.

In the meantime, I would like to offer advice that the evil Masons are
masters of misinformation. Be careful of what you read anywhere. You can
double check with us. Nothing to hide.

I do not hate Masons or anybody, I just hate ignorance. What happens to all
the money generated by the secret societies? This is the question to all of
their members. We are all victims of this evil, stop it now.

I am just one person with a pen and some friends/victims with no funds to
fight our case, can you help?
Join/support us at Open Society, 93 Ashburn Road, Glasgow G62 7PQ Tel.
0141 560 4743 (voicemail)

Hope you are all as well as can be.... Joe Stirling
----------------------------------
More facts about the UK Crown protected and instigated crime can be found
at: This is the real UK.

http://www.mauricekellett.com

http://www.masonsatwork.50megs.com

http://www.mason-rule.bizhosting.com

Post by Old Boy
A radical change in the way we police Britain has sneaked in below the
radar over the past 18 months. In a series of Home Office initiatives
designed to add manpower with particular skills or knowledge to the
regular police force, six new groups of privately sponsored police have
been introduced into the Met and are being deployed in a number of the
provincial forces.
Although they belong to the part-time, normally unpaid branch of the
police - the so-called 'special constables' - there is a big
difference: their time and training is paid for by private sector
employers who agree to loan them to the police for 200 hours a year.
http://www.thefirstpost.co.uk/index.php?menuID=1&subID=925

[milou]

On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 20:40:42 -0800, "m.kellett"

Post by m.kellett
You should first be aware that the Judicial Oath sworn by all UK judges and
magistrates only to Queen Elizabeth II is a fraud of massive proportions.

<snip>

Is this your signature song?
http://www.oldies.com/samples/playtrack.cfm?eurl=5S5GTy6qnFbEYrk0Z22JXDFSBV0TGexkVigbvIO6geas44POjQelZhr3j3Kx%216%21XGnaSg57W4FopoAyeCN1yDw%7C%7C

If above is truncated, shorter link:
http://tinyurl.com/yd2vnz