Blacks must pay reperations to white victims of their lawlessness

[NH]

Just as Muslims have watched jews exploit anti-semitism to their
advantage and copied it with their own "Islamophobia", blacks have seen
jews exploit the Holocaust to mind boggling financial advantage and
seek to imitate it with their own "slavery reperations." Fact is there
are vastly more white victims of black crime, by a factor of 10, than
ever there was or ever will be black victims of white regressions.

It's time for the black community to pay their own policing and
compensations bill!

[w***@googlemail.com]

Post by NH
Just as Muslims have watched jews exploit anti-semitism to their
advantage and copied it with their own "Islamophobia", blacks have seen
jews exploit the Holocaust to mind boggling financial advantage and
seek to imitate it with their own "slavery reperations." Fact is there
are vastly more white victims of black crime, by a factor of 10, than
ever there was or ever will be black victims of white regressions.
It's time for the black community to pay their own policing and
compensations bill!

are you living in the real world "white victims of black crime, by a
factor of 10"
1 im not saying that you are lying and im not saying you are telling
the truth!
you need to state facts not wild accusations for you to obtain any
credibility within your argument.
and as for blacks pay for they own policing and compensations bill
.seems like you have thought well and deep about your proposal
are you saying that the black community should stop paying any kind of
taxation and go it alone?
bear in mind not all black folks have criminal intend.(not even most of
them)
if you knew anything remotely about the black community you would not
make these wild claims.
the truth of the matter in the world today is because of slavery the is
real racism still exist in the world today ,yes from both sides
but one side pretend that it is not there and the other side is always
reminded that this is all you can and will ever be.
many of us out here refuse to play the dangerous game you are playing
here with the remarks you make here.
if you want debate there are many on here who will give you debate of
all nations.
but please do bring facts to the decussions rather than beliefs
confounded to the perimeters of one our soul.
this is a start of a good thread .
i look forward to your replie.

[soup]

Post by w***@googlemail.com
the truth of the matter in the world today is because of slavery the is
real racism still exist in the world today

So the only reason for racism is slavery ?

[joe]

Post by soup

Post by w***@googlemail.com
the truth of the matter in the world today is because of slavery
the is real racism still exist in the world today

So the only reason for racism is slavery ?

No, racism will always exist while scumbag families infest countries
trying to delouse themselves.
Solve immigration problems and cut crime, drop a bomb on Londonstani.

--

[w***@googlemail.com]

Post by soup

Post by w***@googlemail.com
the truth of the matter in the world today is because of slavery the is
real racism still exist in the world today

So the only reason for racism is slavery ?
--
www.cheesesoup.myby.co.uk
http://youtu.be/nileh1ZPGq4

ok lets just say it is up to you how you want to define slavery
slavery is dominance of person or RACE other than your OWN for control
to serve you.
deemed to be worthless can be only of use if under the control of
another being other than they own race.

ok
question if you want somebody to serve you are you going to try and get
somebody YOU think is LOWER than YOU.
or somebody YOU think IS HI than you.
think before you answer and you will find the answer you were
seeking.....
thanks for your comment

[soup]

Post by w***@googlemail.com
ok lets just say it is up to you how you want to define slavery
slavery is dominance of person or RACE other than your OWN for control
to serve you.

Eh? Race is NOT necessarily involved in slavery. You seem to have a
thing that slavery is racially motivated but a quick Google will show
whites as slaves, tribal members sold into slavery by tribal chiefs and
tribal members who have been "taken" in wars sold into slavery

Post by w***@googlemail.com
question if you want somebody to serve you are you going to try and get
somebody YOU think is LOWER than YOU.
or somebody YOU think IS HI than you.

Take it that HI is meant to be HIGHER.
That is a pretty wide net your casting there HIGHER or LOWER, suppose
the same or similar is left

Post by w***@googlemail.com
think before you answer and you will find the answer you were
seeking.....

I was not seeking an answer the question mark in the previous post was
merely there as a grammatical exactitude the question itself was
rhetorical i.e. an answer wasn't required or expected.

[w***@googlemail.com]

Post by soup

Post by w***@googlemail.com
ok lets just say it is up to you how you want to define slavery
slavery is dominance of person or RACE other than your OWN for control
to serve you.

Eh? Race is NOT necessarily involved in slavery. You seem to have a
thing that slavery is racially motivated but a quick Google will show
whites as slaves, tribal members sold into slavery by tribal chiefs and
tribal members who have been "taken" in wars sold into slavery

Post by w***@googlemail.com
question if you want somebody to serve you are you going to try and get
somebody YOU think is LOWER than YOU.
or somebody YOU think IS HI than you.

Take it that HI is meant to be HIGHER.
That is a pretty wide net your casting there HIGHER or LOWER, suppose
the same or similar is left

Post by w***@googlemail.com
think before you answer and you will find the answer you were
seeking.....

I was not seeking an answer the question mark in the previous post was
merely there as a grammatical exactitude the question itself was
rhetorical i.e. an answer wasn't required or expected.
--
www.cheesesoup.myby.co.uk
http://youtu.be/nileh1ZPGq4

yes point agreed about the white slave industry.
are you saying the reason for the white slave industry were the same as
for all other races..
for was under the impression that the early slave trade was to do with
colonialism the domination of one race over by the other be it for
culture differences
forced labour or the most popular reason which i would apply to your
bout or reason constitutes to monetary financial gain.
my argument rest with these points.
blacks sold blacks yes finance and cultueral differences
whites sold whites yes finance
white sold blacks i think you know the story it does not need to be
told here.
the history of banks .banks were formed when the slave trade was in
full swing(don't take my word for it research for yourself)

here is a point would you treat someone of a different race the same
the way you would treat your own or would you treat them lets say
different because you know nothing of they culture and you have heard
what they as a people are all about.without find out for yourself
let me throw this open question to you.
if everyone stayed in their country of origin would racism exist
and further more it would be interesting to read your slant on the
origins of racism. the cause and effects then now and the future
trends.
thank you for your comments

[soup]

Post by w***@googlemail.com

Post by soup

Post by w***@googlemail.com
ok lets just say it is up to you how you want to define slavery
slavery is dominance of person or RACE other than your OWN for control
to serve you.

Eh? Race is NOT necessarily involved in slavery. You seem to have a
thing that slavery is racially motivated but a quick Google will show
whites as slaves, tribal members sold into slavery by tribal chiefs and
tribal members who have been "taken" in wars sold into slavery

Post by w***@googlemail.com
question if you want somebody to serve you are you going to try and get
somebody YOU think is LOWER than YOU.
or somebody YOU think IS HI than you.

Take it that HI is meant to be HIGHER.
That is a pretty wide net your casting there HIGHER or LOWER, suppose
the same or similar is left

Post by w***@googlemail.com
think before you answer and you will find the answer you were
seeking.....

I was not seeking an answer the question mark in the previous post was
merely there as a grammatical exactitude the question itself was
rhetorical i.e. an answer wasn't required or expected.
--
www.cheesesoup.myby.co.uk
http://youtu.be/nileh1ZPGq4

yes point agreed about the white slave industry.
are you saying the reason for the white slave industry were the same as
for all other races..
for was under the impression that the early slave trade was to do with
colonialism the domination of one race over by the other be it for
culture differences
forced labour or the most popular reason which i would apply to your
bout or reason constitutes to monetary financial gain.
my argument rest with these points.
blacks sold blacks yes finance and cultueral differences
whites sold whites yes finance
white sold blacks i think you know the story it does not need to be
told here.
the history of banks .banks were formed when the slave trade was in
full swing(don't take my word for it research for yourself)
here is a point would you treat someone of a different race the same
the way you would treat your own or would you treat them lets say
different because you know nothing of they culture and you have heard
what they as a people are all about.without find out for yourself
let me throw this open question to you.
if everyone stayed in their country of origin would racism exist
and further more it would be interesting to read your slant on the
origins of racism. the cause and effects then now and the future
trends.
thank you for your comments

[soup]

***@googlemail.com wrote:
First of all may I apologise for my previous post I pressed the wrong
button send instead of cut

Post by w***@googlemail.com
blacks sold blacks yes finance and cultueral differences

Where in the case of "chiefs" selling "tribal members" would be the
cultural differences?

Post by w***@googlemail.com
here is a point would you treat someone of a different race the same
the way you would treat your own or would you treat them lets say
different because you know nothing of they culture

I would consider it very patronising to think mine's was the only way to
treat people I may say or do the wrong things but this would be through
ignorance rather than malice.

I still feel you are trying to attribute racism to slavery when it
was not entirely or even mostly about race.

[w***@googlemail.com]

Post by soup
First of all may I apologise for my previous post I pressed the wrong
button send instead of cut

Post by w***@googlemail.com
blacks sold blacks yes finance and cultueral differences

Where in the case of "chiefs" selling "tribal members" would be the
cultural differences?

Post by w***@googlemail.com
here is a point would you treat someone of a different race the same
the way you would treat your own or would you treat them lets say
different because you know nothing of they culture

I would consider it very patronising to think mine's was the only way to
treat people I may say or do the wrong things but this would be through
ignorance rather than malice.
I still feel you are trying to attribute racism to slavery when it
was not entirely or even mostly about race.
--
www.cheesesoup.myby.co.uk
http://youtu.be/nileh1ZPGq4

you have answered your question ,i said for finance and culture
differences or both.
i acept (ignorance rather than malice)we have ball been guilty of this
one time or another.still what i await from you is your view on where
racism stems from.
because im feel i maybe ignorant to your view i need to see some kind
of reference.some kind of factual form of representation from
yourself.something which would let me re-evalulate my views.

[h***@freeispshares.co.uk]

Post by w***@googlemail.com

Post by soup
First of all may I apologise for my previous post I pressed the wrong
button send instead of cut

Post by w***@googlemail.com
blacks sold blacks yes finance and cultueral differences

Where in the case of "chiefs" selling "tribal members" would be the
cultural differences?

Post by w***@googlemail.com
here is a point would you treat someone of a different race the same
the way you would treat your own or would you treat them lets say
different because you know nothing of they culture

I would consider it very patronising to think mine's was the only way to
treat people I may say or do the wrong things but this would be through
ignorance rather than malice.
I still feel you are trying to attribute racism to slavery when it
was not entirely or even mostly about race.
--
www.cheesesoup.myby.co.uk
http://youtu.be/nileh1ZPGq4

you have answered your question ,i said for finance and culture
differences or both.
i acept (ignorance rather than malice)we have ball been guilty of this
one time or another.still what i await from you is your view on where
racism stems from.

To do that you have to describe what 'racism' is.

Post by w***@googlemail.com
because im feel i maybe ignorant to your view i need to see some kind
of reference.some kind of factual form of representation from
yourself.something which would let me re-evalulate my views.

[soup]

Post by w***@googlemail.com
still what i await from you is your view on where
racism stems from.

It is probably an evolutionary thing, nothing to do with slavery, people
distrust maybe even fear that which is "different". Perhaps this "fear"
manifests itself as a desire to put down any alternate culture/people to
ones own, so any alternate civilisation is "seen" as not as "good" as
one's (does that need an apostrophe, after all his /hers/theirs etc
doesn't have one) own.
I feel that until there is the ability to celebrate the differences
between races without being accused of being a racist there will be no
deep meaningfull discussions of these differences.

[Paul Hyett]

Post by soup
I feel that until there is the ability to celebrate the differences
between races without being accused of being a racist there will be no
deep meaningfull discussions of these differences.

That must apply to all sides, though.

In the present situation, the gov't is attempting to brainwash whites
with PC, while other races just laugh & exploit our gullibility.

[soup]

Post by Paul Hyett
That must apply to all sides, though.

TBH I am not one of those that believe that only whites can be racist.

Is tribalist the new PC buzzword for racist or is that reserved for
racism when it's the same race i.e. between Scottish and English

[Paul Hyett]

Post by soup

Post by Paul Hyett
That must apply to all sides, though.

TBH I am not one of those that believe that only whites can be racist.

That belief is confined only to the most terminal cases of PC -
unfortunately, a lot of those are in positions of power...

[Prospero]

Post by Paul Hyett

Post by soup
TBH I am not one of those that believe that only whites can be racist.

That belief is confined only to the most terminal cases of PC -
unfortunately, a lot of those are in positions of power...

That's because they are leftist perverts.

Leftist perverts have taken over Britain - that's why it is so fucked
up.


--

"Yet the legislative being only a fiduciary power to act for certain ends,
there remains still in the people a supreme power to remove or alter the
legislative, when they find the legislative act contrary to the trust reposed
in them....And thus the community perpetually retains a supreme power of saving
themselves from the attempts and designs of any body, even of their legislators,
whenever they shall be so foolish or so wicked as to lay and carry on designs
against the liberties and properties of the subject."
--John Locke

[Madden]

Post by Prospero

Post by Paul Hyett

Post by soup
TBH I am not one of those that believe that only whites can be racist.

That belief is confined only to the most terminal cases of PC -
unfortunately, a lot of those are in positions of power...

That's because they are leftist perverts.
Leftist perverts have taken over Britain - that's why it is so fucked
up.

Back for your annual 'wind up the Brits' visit, Bob?

--
Madden

[Prospero]

Post by Madden

Post by Prospero
Leftist perverts have taken over Britain - that's why it is so fucked
up.

Back for your annual 'wind up the Brits' visit, Bob?

Yes, but it is actually semi-annual. I visit in mid-year and year-end.


--

"Yet the legislative being only a fiduciary power to act for certain ends,
there remains still in the people a supreme power to remove or alter the
legislative, when they find the legislative act contrary to the trust reposed
in them....And thus the community perpetually retains a supreme power of saving
themselves from the attempts and designs of any body, even of their legislators,
whenever they shall be so foolish or so wicked as to lay and carry on designs
against the liberties and properties of the subject."
--John Locke

[Madden]

Post by Prospero

Post by Madden

Post by Prospero
Leftist perverts have taken over Britain - that's why it is so fucked
up.

Back for your annual 'wind up the Brits' visit, Bob?

Yes, but it is actually semi-annual. I visit in mid-year and year-end.

I'll settle back and enjoy the show.

--
Madden

[Prospero]

Post by Madden

Post by Prospero
Yes, but it is actually semi-annual. I visit in mid-year and year-end.

I'll settle back and enjoy the show.

I don't know if there will be any show. uk.p.m. abd uk.legal look
dead.

For example, Paul posted a thread on Biblical proscriptions of
homosexuality which in the past would have resulted in a 1000-post
marathon. But all it got was a wimper.

It's as if after 10 long years of trying to warn limey wankers on
these forums about what is really going on in Britain, they for the
most part have finally caught on and the result is a zombie-like state
of quiet desperation.

I am told - and this is supported by 1000 years of English history -
that the British can be a very fierce group when they get pissed off.
The problem is getting them pissed off enough to obtain a critical
mass.

When that happens, if ever, I fully expect to see the streets of
London lined with the heads of leftist perverts mounted on pikes.




--

"Yet the legislative being only a fiduciary power to act for certain ends,
there remains still in the people a supreme power to remove or alter the
legislative, when they find the legislative act contrary to the trust reposed
in them....And thus the community perpetually retains a supreme power of saving
themselves from the attempts and designs of any body, even of their legislators,
whenever they shall be so foolish or so wicked as to lay and carry on designs
against the liberties and properties of the subject."
--John Locke

[Chris X]

Post by Prospero

Post by Madden

Post by Prospero
Yes, but it is actually semi-annual. I visit in mid-year and year-end.

I'll settle back and enjoy the show.

I don't know if there will be any show. uk.p.m. abd uk.legal look
dead.
For example, Paul posted a thread on Biblical proscriptions of
homosexuality which in the past would have resulted in a 1000-post
marathon. But all it got was a wimper.
"Yet the legislative being only a fiduciary power to act for certain ends,
there remains still in the people a supreme power to remove or alter the
legislative, when they find the legislative act contrary to the trust reposed
in them....And thus the community perpetually retains a supreme power of saving
themselves from the attempts and designs of any body, even of their legislators,
whenever they shall be so foolish or so wicked as to lay and carry on designs
against the liberties and properties of the subject."
--John Locke

Which episode did he say that in ? I must have missed it !

[Prospero]

Post by Chris X

Post by Prospero
"Yet the legislative being only a fiduciary power to act for certain ends,
there remains still in the people a supreme power to remove or alter the
legislative, when they find the legislative act contrary to the trust reposed
in them....And thus the community perpetually retains a supreme power of saving
themselves from the attempts and designs of any body, even of their legislators,
whenever they shall be so foolish or so wicked as to lay and carry on designs
against the liberties and properties of the subject."
--John Locke

Which episode did he say that in ? I must have missed it !

Second Treatise.

--

"Yet the legislative being only a fiduciary power to act for certain
ends, there remains still in the people a supreme power to remove or
alter the legislative, when they find the legislative act contrary to
the trust reposed in them....And thus the community perpetually retains
a supreme power of saving themselves from the attempts and designs of
any body, even of their legislators, whenever they shall be so foolish
or so wicked as to lay and carry on designs against the liberties and
properties of the subject."
--John Locke

[Chris X]

Post by Prospero

Post by Chris X

Post by Prospero
"Yet the legislative being only a fiduciary power to act for certain ends,
there remains still in the people a supreme power to remove or alter the
legislative, when they find the legislative act contrary to the trust reposed
in them....And thus the community perpetually retains a supreme power of saving
themselves from the attempts and designs of any body, even of their legislators,
whenever they shall be so foolish or so wicked as to lay and carry on designs
against the liberties and properties of the subject."
--John Locke

Which episode did he say that in ? I must have missed it !

Second Treatise.

Hmmm, refresh my memory - was that before or after they found the hatch ?

[Rachel Harrassment]

Post by Prospero

Post by Madden

Post by Prospero
Leftist perverts have taken over Britain - that's why it is so fucked
up.

Back for your annual 'wind up the Brits' visit, Bob?

Yes, but it is actually semi-annual. I visit in mid-year and year-end.
--
"Yet the legislative being only a fiduciary power to act for certain ends,
there remains still in the people a supreme power to remove or alter the
legislative, when they find the legislative act contrary to the trust reposed
in them....And thus the community perpetually retains a supreme power of saving
themselves from the attempts and designs of any body, even of their legislators,
whenever they shall be so foolish or so wicked as to lay and carry on designs
against the liberties and properties of the subject."
--John Locke

Hey, I love your sig, it's hilarious while at the same time, so profound. I
just know I'm going to be laughing to myself all next week. Heh, that John
Locke, what a kickass funny dude.

Hugs n' kisses,
Rachel Harrassment.

[Prospero]

Post by Rachel Harrassment
Hey, I love your sig, it's hilarious while at the same time, so profound. I
just know I'm going to be laughing to myself all next week. Heh, that John
Locke, what a kickass funny dude.

Yeah, Ol' Tommy Jefferson used to crack up when he read Locke's
treatices on politics.

This will get anyone laughing: Locke was an advocate of Tyrannicide:

"A ruler who violates natural law is illegitimate. He has no right to
be obeyed, his commands are mere force and coercion. Rulers who act
lawlessly, whose laws are unlawful, are mere criminals, and should be
dealt with in accordance with natural law, as applied in a state of
nature, in other words they and their servants should be killed as the
opportunity presents, like the dangerous animals that they are, the
common enemies of all mankind."
--John Locke


--

"Yet the legislative being only a fiduciary power to act for certain
ends, there remains still in the people a supreme power to remove or
alter the legislative, when they find the legislative act contrary to
the trust reposed in them....And thus the community perpetually retains
a supreme power of saving themselves from the attempts and designs of
any body, even of their legislators, whenever they shall be so foolish
or so wicked as to lay and carry on designs against the liberties and
properties of the subject."
--John Locke

[Rachel Harrassment]

Post by Prospero

Post by Rachel Harrassment
Hey, I love your sig, it's hilarious while at the same time, so profound. I
just know I'm going to be laughing to myself all next week. Heh, that John
Locke, what a kickass funny dude.

Yeah, Ol' Tommy Jefferson used to crack up when he read Locke's
treatices on politics.
"A ruler who violates natural law is illegitimate. He has no right to
be obeyed, his commands are mere force and coercion. Rulers who act
lawlessly, whose laws are unlawful, are mere criminals, and should be
dealt with in accordance with natural law, as applied in a state of
nature, in other words they and their servants should be killed as the
opportunity presents, like the dangerous animals that they are, the
common enemies of all mankind."
--John Locke
--
"Yet the legislative being only a fiduciary power to act for certain
ends, there remains still in the people a supreme power to remove or
alter the legislative, when they find the legislative act contrary to
the trust reposed in them....And thus the community perpetually retains
a supreme power of saving themselves from the attempts and designs of
any body, even of their legislators, whenever they shall be so foolish
or so wicked as to lay and carry on designs against the liberties and
properties of the subject."
--John Locke

He certainly had a way with words. However, I still prefer the original,
your sig. Ahhh, 'fiduciary' - it brings back wonderful memories of Judge
Judy (All stand) trying to explain to a gentleman of colour, why he had lost
his case.

Regards.

[Rachel Harrassment]

Post by Prospero

Post by Madden

Post by Prospero
Leftist perverts have taken over Britain - that's why it is so fucked
up.

Back for your annual 'wind up the Brits' visit, Bob?

Yes, but it is actually semi-annual. I visit in mid-year and year-end.
--
"Yet the legislative being only a fiduciary power to act for certain ends,
there remains still in the people a supreme power to remove or alter the
legislative, when they find the legislative act contrary to the trust reposed
in them....And thus the community perpetually retains a supreme power of saving
themselves from the attempts and designs of any body, even of their legislators,
whenever they shall be so foolish or so wicked as to lay and carry on designs
against the liberties and properties of the subject."
--John Locke

Actually, further to my earlier post about that fantastic sig of yours.....
"the legislative being only a fiduciary power to act for certain ends"-
hahahahaaaa...oh man that one cracks me up!!! - Hahaaaaaahahahahahaaa!!.....
ahem, anyway, heh, oh dear, anyway..... I was looking for a good laugh
and.... I was merely pondering..... "the legislative act contrary to the
trust reposed" - BWAAAAHAHAHAHAAA!! - sorry, ahem, no, heh... ahum.. I was
pondering whether to:

(a) Read your sig again
(b) Watch "Team America - World Police"

Ohhhh.... "fiduciary"...BWAHAHAHAAAA!!!!!..... aha.... hm.. <cough>...
sorry.

Rachel Harrassment.

[h***@freeispshares.co.uk]

Post by w***@googlemail.com

Post by soup

Post by w***@googlemail.com
ok lets just say it is up to you how you want to define slavery
slavery is dominance of person or RACE other than your OWN for control
to serve you.

Eh? Race is NOT necessarily involved in slavery. You seem to have a
thing that slavery is racially motivated but a quick Google will show
whites as slaves, tribal members sold into slavery by tribal chiefs and
tribal members who have been "taken" in wars sold into slavery

Post by w***@googlemail.com
question if you want somebody to serve you are you going to try and get
somebody YOU think is LOWER than YOU.
or somebody YOU think IS HI than you.

Take it that HI is meant to be HIGHER.
That is a pretty wide net your casting there HIGHER or LOWER, suppose
the same or similar is left

Post by w***@googlemail.com
think before you answer and you will find the answer you were
seeking.....

I was not seeking an answer the question mark in the previous post was
merely there as a grammatical exactitude the question itself was
rhetorical i.e. an answer wasn't required or expected.
--
www.cheesesoup.myby.co.uk
http://youtu.be/nileh1ZPGq4

yes point agreed about the white slave industry.
are you saying the reason for the white slave industry were the same as
for all other races..
for was under the impression that the early slave trade was to do with
colonialism the domination of one race over by the other be it for
culture differences

No, see below.

Post by w***@googlemail.com
forced labour or the most popular reason which i would apply to your
bout or reason constitutes to monetary financial gain.
my argument rest with these points.
blacks sold blacks yes finance and cultueral differences
whites sold whites yes finance
white sold blacks i think you know the story it does not need to be
told here.
the history of banks .banks were formed when the slave trade was in
full swing(don't take my word for it research for yourself)
here is a point would you treat someone of a different race the same
the way you would treat your own or would you treat them lets say
different because you know nothing of they culture and you have heard
what they as a people are all about.without find out for yourself
let me throw this open question to you.
if everyone stayed in their country of origin would racism exist
and further more it would be interesting to read your slant on the
origins of racism. the cause and effects then now and the future
trends.

Well as I understand it the first slaves taken to the West Indies were
white, but they proved less able to stand up to the climate than black
slaves. Hence the treatment of blacks the same as whites.

[h***@freeispshares.co.uk]

Post by w***@googlemail.com

Post by soup

Post by w***@googlemail.com
the truth of the matter in the world today is because of slavery the is
real racism still exist in the world today

So the only reason for racism is slavery ?
--
www.cheesesoup.myby.co.uk
http://youtu.be/nileh1ZPGq4

ok lets just say it is up to you how you want to define slavery
slavery is dominance of person or RACE other than your OWN for control
to serve you.
deemed to be worthless can be only of use if under the control of
another being other than they own race.

What nonsense! Were the Romans of a different race from the Britons?
No! Furthermore, quite obviously slaves were/are not deemed to be
worthless because they have a price!

Post by w***@googlemail.com
ok
question if you want somebody to serve you are you going to try and get
somebody YOU think is LOWER than YOU.
or somebody YOU think IS HI than you.

It's economics!

[w***@googlemail.com]

Post by h***@freeispshares.co.uk

Post by w***@googlemail.com

Post by soup

Post by w***@googlemail.com
the truth of the matter in the world today is because of slavery the is
real racism still exist in the world today

So the only reason for racism is slavery ?
--
www.cheesesoup.myby.co.uk
http://youtu.be/nileh1ZPGq4

ok lets just say it is up to you how you want to define slavery
slavery is dominance of person or RACE other than your OWN for control
to serve you.
deemed to be worthless can be only of use if under the control of
another being other than they own race.

What nonsense! Were the Romans of a different race from the Britons?
No! Furthermore, quite obviously slaves were/are not deemed to be
worthless because they have a price!

Post by w***@googlemail.com
ok
question if you want somebody to serve you are you going to try and get
somebody YOU think is LOWER than YOU.
or somebody YOU think IS HI than you.

It's economics!

Were the Romans of a different race from the Britons?
excuse me
how big of you to post your statemnet of fact according to you
would love to know where you got your facts from.when you have them
please come back here so we can debate.
for your comments are pointless

[Madden]

Post by h***@freeispshares.co.uk

Post by h***@freeispshares.co.uk

Post by w***@googlemail.com

Post by soup

Post by w***@googlemail.com
the truth of the matter in the world today is because of slavery the is
real racism still exist in the world today

So the only reason for racism is slavery ?
--
www.cheesesoup.myby.co.uk
http://youtu.be/nileh1ZPGq4

ok lets just say it is up to you how you want to define slavery
slavery is dominance of person or RACE other than your OWN for control
to serve you.
deemed to be worthless can be only of use if under the control of
another being other than they own race.

What nonsense! Were the Romans of a different race from the Britons?
No! Furthermore, quite obviously slaves were/are not deemed to be
worthless because they have a price!

Post by w***@googlemail.com
ok
question if you want somebody to serve you are you going to try and get
somebody YOU think is LOWER than YOU.
or somebody YOU think IS HI than you.

It's economics!

Were the Romans of a different race from the Britons?
excuse me
how big of you to post your statemnet of fact according to you
would love to know where you got your facts from.when you have them
please come back here so we can debate.
for your comments are pointless

If it would help

http://www.racialcompact.com/racesofhumanity.html

quote
By 40,000 years ago the divergent evolutionary branching or dividing
of the human species had produced five main lines or subspecies which
are still extant -- the Congoid and Capoid of sub-Saharan Africa, the
Australoid of India, Southeast Asia, Indonesia, New Guinea and
Australia, the Mongoloid of Northeast Asia (expanding after 20,000
B.C. into the Americas and replacing the Australoids in Southeast Asia
and Indonesia after 4,000 B.C.) and the Caucasoid of Europe, North
Africa and West Asia (partly replacing the Australoids in India after
8,000 B.C., the Mongoloids in the Americas after A.D. 1492, and the
Australoids in Australia after A.D. 1788). These subspecies branched
or divided in turn into separate races, and these races branched in
their turn into subraces, as part of the continuing process of
divergent evolution.
end quote

The Romans and the Britons were predominantly Caucasoid.

--
Madden

[w***@googlemail.com]

Post by Madden

Post by h***@freeispshares.co.uk

Post by h***@freeispshares.co.uk

Post by w***@googlemail.com

Post by soup

Post by w***@googlemail.com
the truth of the matter in the world today is because of slavery the is
real racism still exist in the world today

So the only reason for racism is slavery ?
--
www.cheesesoup.myby.co.uk
http://youtu.be/nileh1ZPGq4

ok lets just say it is up to you how you want to define slavery
slavery is dominance of person or RACE other than your OWN for control
to serve you.
deemed to be worthless can be only of use if under the control of
another being other than they own race.

What nonsense! Were the Romans of a different race from the Britons?
No! Furthermore, quite obviously slaves were/are not deemed to be
worthless because they have a price!

Post by w***@googlemail.com
ok
question if you want somebody to serve you are you going to try and get
somebody YOU think is LOWER than YOU.
or somebody YOU think IS HI than you.

It's economics!

Were the Romans of a different race from the Britons?
excuse me
how big of you to post your statemnet of fact according to you
would love to know where you got your facts from.when you have them
please come back here so we can debate.
for your comments are pointless

If it would help
http://www.racialcompact.com/racesofhumanity.html
quote
By 40,000 years ago the divergent evolutionary branching or dividing
of the human species had produced five main lines or subspecies which
are still extant -- the Congoid and Capoid of sub-Saharan Africa, the
Australoid of India, Southeast Asia, Indonesia, New Guinea and
Australia, the Mongoloid of Northeast Asia (expanding after 20,000
B.C. into the Americas and replacing the Australoids in Southeast Asia
and Indonesia after 4,000 B.C.) and the Caucasoid of Europe, North
Africa and West Asia (partly replacing the Australoids in India after
8,000 B.C., the Mongoloids in the Americas after A.D. 1492, and the
Australoids in Australia after A.D. 1788). These subspecies branched
or divided in turn into separate races, and these races branched in
their turn into subraces, as part of the continuing process of
divergent evolution.
end quote
The Romans and the Britons were predominantly Caucasoid.
--
Madden

yes point agreed good point.
but the debate was not necessary related to where on the geographic
part of the world the caucasoid race occupied but what was their social
structure and how they viewed other existing other cultures bar they
own.that is the issue i think my other fellow debater got confused.
thanks for your comment

[h***@freeispshares.co.uk]

Post by w***@googlemail.com

Post by Madden

Post by h***@freeispshares.co.uk

Post by h***@freeispshares.co.uk

Post by w***@googlemail.com

Post by soup

Post by w***@googlemail.com
the truth of the matter in the world today is because of slavery the is
real racism still exist in the world today

So the only reason for racism is slavery ?
--
www.cheesesoup.myby.co.uk
http://youtu.be/nileh1ZPGq4

ok lets just say it is up to you how you want to define slavery
slavery is dominance of person or RACE other than your OWN for control
to serve you.
deemed to be worthless can be only of use if under the control of
another being other than they own race.

What nonsense! Were the Romans of a different race from the Britons?
No! Furthermore, quite obviously slaves were/are not deemed to be
worthless because they have a price!

Post by w***@googlemail.com
ok
question if you want somebody to serve you are you going to try and get
somebody YOU think is LOWER than YOU.
or somebody YOU think IS HI than you.

It's economics!

Were the Romans of a different race from the Britons?
excuse me
how big of you to post your statemnet of fact according to you
would love to know where you got your facts from.when you have them
please come back here so we can debate.
for your comments are pointless

If it would help
http://www.racialcompact.com/racesofhumanity.html
quote
By 40,000 years ago the divergent evolutionary branching or dividing
of the human species had produced five main lines or subspecies which
are still extant -- the Congoid and Capoid of sub-Saharan Africa, the
Australoid of India, Southeast Asia, Indonesia, New Guinea and
Australia, the Mongoloid of Northeast Asia (expanding after 20,000
B.C. into the Americas and replacing the Australoids in Southeast Asia
and Indonesia after 4,000 B.C.) and the Caucasoid of Europe, North
Africa and West Asia (partly replacing the Australoids in India after
8,000 B.C., the Mongoloids in the Americas after A.D. 1492, and the
Australoids in Australia after A.D. 1788). These subspecies branched
or divided in turn into separate races, and these races branched in
their turn into subraces, as part of the continuing process of
divergent evolution.
end quote
The Romans and the Britons were predominantly Caucasoid.
--
Madden

yes point agreed good point.
but the debate was not necessary related to where on the geographic
part of the world the caucasoid race occupied but what was their social
structure and how they viewed other existing other cultures bar they
own.that is the issue i think my other fellow debater got confused.

Er ... it was you who said "slavery is dominance of person or RACE
other than your OWN", so I pointed out that slavery is not necessarily
dominance of a race other than your own.
Do you actually understand what you are saying, or do the words just
tumble from your mouth without any rational thought process preceding
them?

[w***@googlemail.com]

Post by h***@freeispshares.co.uk

Post by w***@googlemail.com

Post by Madden

Post by h***@freeispshares.co.uk

Post by h***@freeispshares.co.uk

Post by w***@googlemail.com

Post by soup

Post by w***@googlemail.com
the truth of the matter in the world today is because of slavery the is
real racism still exist in the world today

So the only reason for racism is slavery ?
--
www.cheesesoup.myby.co.uk
http://youtu.be/nileh1ZPGq4

ok lets just say it is up to you how you want to define slavery
slavery is dominance of person or RACE other than your OWN for control
to serve you.
deemed to be worthless can be only of use if under the control of
another being other than they own race.

What nonsense! Were the Romans of a different race from the Britons?
No! Furthermore, quite obviously slaves were/are not deemed to be
worthless because they have a price!

Post by w***@googlemail.com
ok
question if you want somebody to serve you are you going to try and get
somebody YOU think is LOWER than YOU.
or somebody YOU think IS HI than you.

It's economics!

Were the Romans of a different race from the Britons?
excuse me
how big of you to post your statemnet of fact according to you
would love to know where you got your facts from.when you have them
please come back here so we can debate.
for your comments are pointless

If it would help
http://www.racialcompact.com/racesofhumanity.html
quote
By 40,000 years ago the divergent evolutionary branching or dividing
of the human species had produced five main lines or subspecies which
are still extant -- the Congoid and Capoid of sub-Saharan Africa, the
Australoid of India, Southeast Asia, Indonesia, New Guinea and
Australia, the Mongoloid of Northeast Asia (expanding after 20,000
B.C. into the Americas and replacing the Australoids in Southeast Asia
and Indonesia after 4,000 B.C.) and the Caucasoid of Europe, North
Africa and West Asia (partly replacing the Australoids in India after
8,000 B.C., the Mongoloids in the Americas after A.D. 1492, and the
Australoids in Australia after A.D. 1788). These subspecies branched
or divided in turn into separate races, and these races branched in
their turn into subraces, as part of the continuing process of
divergent evolution.
end quote
The Romans and the Britons were predominantly Caucasoid.
--
Madden

yes point agreed good point.
but the debate was not necessary related to where on the geographic
part of the world the caucasoid race occupied but what was their social
structure and how they viewed other existing other cultures bar they
own.that is the issue i think my other fellow debater got confused.

Er ... it was you who said "slavery is dominance of person or RACE
other than your OWN", so I pointed out that slavery is not necessarily
dominance of a race other than your own.
Do you actually understand what you are saying, or do the words just
tumble from your mouth without any rational thought process preceding
them?

yes if you have bothered to read what i post in full you will see that
i broke down the factors of what may be the cause of racism.
just to answer some of the other post racism is NOT confined to just
the Caucasoids.believe it or not!
there is black who don't like white,asian who don't like white,black
who don't like african,people from the small islands(black race has
many cultures.
whites who don't like whites Irish, scottish, wales etc need i go on.
i know people of all these cultures and able to move among them with no
problems(the ones i know) they view how they see other people may not
necessary be my views.(those who in fight amongst themselves will pick
a fight with all comers.
i see post saying how many blacks are in prison and i ask why is it
that an higher proportion on blacks are considered for custodial
sentences than other races committing the same crimes.yet in the same
breath why is it that unemployment is so high amongst the same.at the
same time this is no excuse for people to be envolved in crime to that
degree.every race has this problem.

[Raymond Richardson]

Post by NH
Just as Muslims have watched jews exploit anti-semitism to their
advantage and copied it with their own "Islamophobia", blacks have seen
jews exploit the Holocaust to mind boggling financial advantage and
seek to imitate it with their own "slavery reperations." Fact is there
are vastly more white victims of black crime, by a factor of 10, than
ever there was or ever will be black victims of white regressions.
It's time for the black community to pay their own policing and
compensations bill!

Here are some American statistics. They were
recently calculated by Jared Taylor at American Renaissance and can be
purchased as a detailed booklet called The Color of Crime for $8.95 from
http://www.amren.com/store/colorcrime.htm. The Major Findings:

. Police and the justice system are not biased against minorities.

Crime Rates

. Blacks are seven times more likely than people of other races to commit
murder, and eight times more likely to commit robbery.

. When blacks commit crimes of violence, they are nearly three times more
likely than non-blacks to use a gun, and more than twice as likely to use a
knife.

. Hispanics commit violent crimes at roughly three times the white rate, and
Asians commit violent crimes at about one quarter the white rate.

. The single best indicator of violent crime levels in an area is the
percentage of the population that is black and Hispanic.

Interracial Crime

. Of the nearly 770,000 violent interracial crimes committed every year
involving blacks and whites, blacks commit 85 percent and whites commit 15
percent.

. Blacks commit more violent crime against whites than against blacks.
Forty-five percent of their victims are white, 43 percent are black, and 10
percent are Hispanic. When whites commit violent crime, only three percent
of their victims are black.

. Blacks are an estimated 39 times more likely to commit a violent crime
against a white than vice versa, and 136 times more likely to commit
robbery.

. Blacks are 2.25 times more likely to commit officially-designated hate
crimes against whites than vice versa.

Gangs

. Only 10 percent of youth gang members are white.

. Hispanics are 19 times more likely than whites to be members of youth
gangs. Blacks are 15 times more likely, and Asians are nine times more
likely.

Incarceration

. Between 1980 and 2003 the US incarceration rate more than tripled, from
139 to 482 per 100,000, and the number of prisoners increased from 320,000
to 1.39 million.

. Blacks are seven times more likely to be in prison than whites. Hispanics
are three times more likely.

Cheers John

[Alex]

At 19:11:03 on 27/11/2006, Raymond Richardson delighted uk.legal by

Post by Raymond Richardson

Post by NH
Just as Muslims have watched jews exploit anti-semitism to their
advantage and copied it with their own "Islamophobia", blacks have
seen jews exploit the Holocaust to mind boggling financial
advantage and seek to imitate it with their own "slavery
reperations." Fact is there are vastly more white victims of black
crime, by a factor of 10, than ever there was or ever will be black
victims of white regressions.
It's time for the black community to pay their own policing and
compensations bill!

Here are some American statistics.

And therefore largely meaningless in the UK.

[Andrew Thomas]

Post by Alex
At 19:11:03 on 27/11/2006, Raymond Richardson delighted uk.legal by

Post by Raymond Richardson
Here are some American statistics.

And therefore largely meaningless in the UK.

As meaningless as this?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/6176854.stm

It's OK, it's the BBC, trusted throughout the globe. It won't put
spyware on your PC or owt.

[Alex]

At 20:57:19 on 27/11/2006, Andrew Thomas delighted uk.legal by

Post by Andrew Thomas

Post by Alex
At 19:11:03 on 27/11/2006, Raymond Richardson delighted uk.legal by

Post by Raymond Richardson
Here are some American statistics.

And therefore largely meaningless in the UK.

As meaningless as this?

No. That's a story from the UK and therefore relevant to the UK.

[RJR]

Offically statistics on race and crime are not collected in this country.
But police forces with large minorities in their areas probably collect
figures for a few eyes only such as the Home Secretary. To see what could
be going on go to www.met.police.uk/wanted/ and
http://www.west-midlands.police.uk/wanted/index.asp

RJR

Post by Alex
At 20:57:19 on 27/11/2006, Andrew Thomas delighted uk.legal by

Post by Andrew Thomas

Post by Alex
At 19:11:03 on 27/11/2006, Raymond Richardson delighted uk.legal by

Post by Raymond Richardson
Here are some American statistics.

And therefore largely meaningless in the UK.

As meaningless as this?

No. That's a story from the UK and therefore relevant to the UK.

[h***@freeispshares.co.uk]

Post by RJR
Offically statistics on race and crime are not collected in this country.

I believe they were until a few years ago. Perhaps the truth hurt too
much.

Post by RJR
But police forces with large minorities in their areas probably collect
figures for a few eyes only such as the Home Secretary. To see what could
be going on go to www.met.police.uk/wanted/ and
http://www.west-midlands.police.uk/wanted/index.asp
RJR

Post by Alex
At 20:57:19 on 27/11/2006, Andrew Thomas delighted uk.legal by

Post by Andrew Thomas

Post by Alex
At 19:11:03 on 27/11/2006, Raymond Richardson delighted uk.legal by

Post by Raymond Richardson
Here are some American statistics.

And therefore largely meaningless in the UK.

As meaningless as this?

No. That's a story from the UK and therefore relevant to the UK.

[t***@yahoo.co.uk]

Post by Alex
At 19:11:03 on 27/11/2006, Raymond Richardson delighted uk.legal by

Post by Raymond Richardson

Post by NH
Just as Muslims have watched jews exploit anti-semitism to their
advantage and copied it with their own "Islamophobia", blacks have
seen jews exploit the Holocaust to mind boggling financial
advantage and seek to imitate it with their own "slavery
reperations." Fact is there are vastly more white victims of black
crime, by a factor of 10, than ever there was or ever will be black
victims of white regressions.
It's time for the black community to pay their own policing and
compensations bill!

Here are some American statistics.

And therefore largely meaningless in the UK.

Black attacks an old lady. This happens all the time in the UK,
unreported by the establishment media since the victims are white
working class people and the attackers are black.

http://www.amw.com/fugitives/video_photos.cfm?id=31704&video_id=313&quality=high

[w***@googlemail.com]

Post by t***@yahoo.co.uk

Post by Alex
At 19:11:03 on 27/11/2006, Raymond Richardson delighted uk.legal by

Post by Raymond Richardson

Post by NH
Just as Muslims have watched jews exploit anti-semitism to their
advantage and copied it with their own "Islamophobia", blacks have
seen jews exploit the Holocaust to mind boggling financial
advantage and seek to imitate it with their own "slavery
reperations." Fact is there are vastly more white victims of black
crime, by a factor of 10, than ever there was or ever will be black
victims of white regressions.
It's time for the black community to pay their own policing and
compensations bill!

Here are some American statistics.

And therefore largely meaningless in the UK.

Black attacks an old lady. This happens all the time in the UK,
unreported by the establishment media since the victims are white
working class people and the attackers are black.
http://www.amw.com/fugitives/video_photos.cfm?id=31704&video_id=313&quality=high

why do you say this happens all the time in the uk trying to make out
it is only black folks who do these things
when you know that all races are involed in these things as well.you
can state all the reports that have been made on the subject.but you
will find none of them are ever accurate.
they make out that black folks to a decree that black folks are
responsible for most crimes(yea there was no crimes before they were
integrated into the usa and the uk)
yea if you look at history written by white folks you would see there
were worse crimes committed without the help of any other race been
around.
don't take my word for it please check your history.
i have also notice that when black folks commit some type of crime
there some folks quick to post it in some group.
but you know what i read the daily newspapers and i watch more than one
type of news program
i see both black and white committing crimes .
do you think you can score more points posting stuff like
this.......get real
crime is a worldwide thing .
as for black crime not been reported what papers do you read?because if
i don't see the story i will sure hear about.
the reason why you may not hear that much about it is the fact white
folks are already worried about how many immigrant's surround them.
for one moment think to yourself what if every time you turned on the
news you hear that it was just black folks doing all the crimes there
would be fear beyond your wildest dreams.every black person would be a
suspect.
yet when we go back to history white folks have perpetrated the most
serious crimes know to man and it till goes on now.are you going to
play short sighted and over look that...
you say the bbc over looks this yet i watch crime-watch(might see
someone i know lol) and i see all nations.
black folks have the lowest IQ's lol .it not what i see ,i have seen
(know)black folk who have lost out in jobs to whites with lower IQ's
this is a job which the black person has covered for 2 yrs running a
department within a housing corporation.when head managment wanted the
post fulled this lady had to apply
she has various degrees and other qualifications yet some lady who was
off on sick leave was asked to com in and apply even though she did not
have the experience or the qualifications none skills to do the job
,yet she got it and leaned on the lady who did not get the job to
support her with the skills she as lacking.neatherless to say the lady
who did not get the post took constructive dismissal and sued and
won.these are the things you will not hear about.or would'nt bother
you.a lot of people have to take the blickers off and start looking at
people for people and try and learn somthing .stop listening to hear
say and check things out for yourself if you are able.you will soon
find the world is not what it seems
just for the record i have black white ,asian within my family and i
don't give a flying shit what anybody thinks about it.and yea they are
all educated and employed not sponging off the state.thanks for your
comments

[Rachel Harrassment]

Post by w***@googlemail.com

Post by t***@yahoo.co.uk

Post by Alex
At 19:11:03 on 27/11/2006, Raymond Richardson delighted uk.legal by

Post by Raymond Richardson

Post by NH
Just as Muslims have watched jews exploit anti-semitism to their
advantage and copied it with their own "Islamophobia", blacks have
seen jews exploit the Holocaust to mind boggling financial
advantage and seek to imitate it with their own "slavery
reperations." Fact is there are vastly more white victims of black
crime, by a factor of 10, than ever there was or ever will be black
victims of white regressions.
It's time for the black community to pay their own policing and
compensations bill!

Here are some American statistics.

And therefore largely meaningless in the UK.

Black attacks an old lady. This happens all the time in the UK,
unreported by the establishment media since the victims are white
working class people and the attackers are black.
http://www.amw.com/fugitives/video_photos.cfm?id=31704&video_id=313&quality=high

why do you say this happens all the time in the uk trying to make out
it is only black folks who do these things
when you know that all races are involed in these things as well.you
can state all the reports that have been made on the subject.but you
will find none of them are ever accurate.
they make out that black folks to a decree that black folks are
responsible for most crimes(yea there was no crimes before they were
integrated into the usa and the uk)
yea if you look at history written by white folks you would see there
were worse crimes committed without the help of any other race been
around.
don't take my word for it please check your history.
i have also notice that when black folks commit some type of crime
there some folks quick to post it in some group.
but you know what i read the daily newspapers and i watch more than one
type of news program
i see both black and white committing crimes .
do you think you can score more points posting stuff like
this.......get real
crime is a worldwide thing .
as for black crime not been reported what papers do you read?because if
i don't see the story i will sure hear about.
the reason why you may not hear that much about it is the fact white
folks are already worried about how many immigrant's surround them.
for one moment think to yourself what if every time you turned on the
news you hear that it was just black folks doing all the crimes there
would be fear beyond your wildest dreams.every black person would be a
suspect.
yet when we go back to history white folks have perpetrated the most
serious crimes know to man and it till goes on now.are you going to
play short sighted and over look that...
you say the bbc over looks this yet i watch crime-watch(might see
someone i know lol) and i see all nations.
black folks have the lowest IQ's lol .it not what i see ,i have seen
(know)black folk who have lost out in jobs to whites with lower IQ's
this is a job which the black person has covered for 2 yrs running a
department within a housing corporation.when head managment wanted the
post fulled this lady had to apply
she has various degrees and other qualifications yet some lady who was
off on sick leave was asked to com in and apply even though she did not
have the experience or the qualifications none skills to do the job
,yet she got it and leaned on the lady who did not get the job to
support her with the skills she as lacking.neatherless to say the lady
who did not get the post took constructive dismissal and sued and
won.these are the things you will not hear about.or would'nt bother
you.a lot of people have to take the blickers off and start looking at
people for people and try and learn somthing .stop listening to hear
say and check things out for yourself if you are able.you will soon
find the world is not what it seems
just for the record i have black white ,asian within my family and i
don't give a flying shit what anybody thinks about it.and yea they are
all educated and employed not sponging off the state.thanks for your
comments

Heh! BWAHHAHAHAHAHAHA!! HEH.... BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAA!!!
OH dear, you crack me up, you comic!!

Rachel Harrassment.

[h***@freeispshares.co.uk]

Post by w***@googlemail.com

Post by t***@yahoo.co.uk

Post by Alex
At 19:11:03 on 27/11/2006, Raymond Richardson delighted uk.legal by

Post by Raymond Richardson

Post by NH
Just as Muslims have watched jews exploit anti-semitism to their
advantage and copied it with their own "Islamophobia", blacks have
seen jews exploit the Holocaust to mind boggling financial
advantage and seek to imitate it with their own "slavery
reperations." Fact is there are vastly more white victims of black
crime, by a factor of 10, than ever there was or ever will be black
victims of white regressions.
It's time for the black community to pay their own policing and
compensations bill!

Here are some American statistics.

And therefore largely meaningless in the UK.

Black attacks an old lady. This happens all the time in the UK,
unreported by the establishment media since the victims are white
working class people and the attackers are black.
http://www.amw.com/fugitives/video_photos.cfm?id=31704&video_id=313&quality=high

why do you say this happens all the time in the uk trying to make out
it is only black folks who do these things
when you know that all races are involed in these things as well.you
can state all the reports that have been made on the subject.but you
will find none of them are ever accurate.
they make out that black folks to a decree that black folks are
responsible for most crimes(yea there was no crimes before they were
integrated into the usa and the uk)

The point, which seems to have escaped you, is that blacks have a
higher propensity to crime than do the white natives. The natives are
disproportionately the victims of black crime. Even if the blacks kept
their crimes within the black "community" the natives would still have
to pay the costs of black crime. Without black immigration, the crime
rate would be lower.
The natives never asked for black immigration and a very great
injustice has been done to them. It is indeed high time that the
blacks paid reparations to the natives of this country.

[w***@googlemail.com]

Post by h***@freeispshares.co.uk

Post by w***@googlemail.com

Post by t***@yahoo.co.uk

Post by Alex
At 19:11:03 on 27/11/2006, Raymond Richardson delighted uk.legal by

Post by Raymond Richardson

Post by NH
Just as Muslims have watched jews exploit anti-semitism to their
advantage and copied it with their own "Islamophobia", blacks have
seen jews exploit the Holocaust to mind boggling financial
advantage and seek to imitate it with their own "slavery
reperations." Fact is there are vastly more white victims of black
crime, by a factor of 10, than ever there was or ever will be black
victims of white regressions.
It's time for the black community to pay their own policing and
compensations bill!

Here are some American statistics.

And therefore largely meaningless in the UK.

Black attacks an old lady. This happens all the time in the UK,
unreported by the establishment media since the victims are white
working class people and the attackers are black.
http://www.amw.com/fugitives/video_photos.cfm?id=31704&video_id=313&quality=high

why do you say this happens all the time in the uk trying to make out
it is only black folks who do these things
when you know that all races are involed in these things as well.you
can state all the reports that have been made on the subject.but you
will find none of them are ever accurate.
they make out that black folks to a decree that black folks are
responsible for most crimes(yea there was no crimes before they were
integrated into the usa and the uk)

The point, which seems to have escaped you, is that blacks have a
higher propensity to crime than do the white natives. The natives are
disproportionately the victims of black crime. Even if the blacks kept
their crimes within the black "community" the natives would still have
to pay the costs of black crime. Without black immigration, the crime
rate would be lower.
The natives never asked for black immigration and a very great
injustice has been done to them. It is indeed high time that the
blacks paid reparations to the natives of this country.

Without black immigration, the crime rate would be lower!!!!!! what!
lets be real here you talk about the natives paying the cost for black
crime ,does that mean than the natives do it for free.so much is wrong
with what you state here
i don't want to sound racist.here put the same natives you talk about
have been the champions of crime worldwide for generations and it still
going on today and thats been putting it lightly.you talk about
injustice and blacks should pay the natives for reparation to this
country.
where are the natives of this country better still name them.look at
the english language what is it made up from.when you go out for a meal
look at the dishes all english?
whats been taken from the natives that they need reparation for?
the natives have been milking all the third world counties for years (i
hope i can call you friend) gold minerals oil riches.
feed the world !what a load of BS how can you send money to a country
which is so rich in all these resources capable of feeding the whole
world yet they are still poor?
the riches companies in the world do business there shell ,bp,(moblie
phone companies look at the materials needed for gsm phones please do
the research i have .
yes there governments who are corrupt.have you thought to yourself why
!!
have you thought to yourself why is it all these so called third world
countries surrounding all these western powers are so poor yet they are
number one holiday destinations.
yet you look at yor supermarkets and them awash with food.
the british and the americans backed the likes have saddam hussein
/Osama Bin Laden for years until they refused to toll the line then
they wanted to take them down.

general pinochet of Chile under his dictatorship " human rights abuses
" where did he go when he had to get out of his country ?
the uk.
they welcome him with open arms.
what about all the people he murdered while he was in power or does'nt
that matter.
are these not the same natives of this country you are talking about
who condone all these acts or are you talking about some other natives?

to answer your other question of the " The natives never asked for
black immigration "!!!!!!!!!
you must be younger than i thought blacks were asked to come here from
the fifties to come here and do the jobs whites would not do (where
have you been)
im afraid history is not one of your strongest forties.

guest what its happening again right before your eyes.
the govement is opening the gates to more people from the European
states (poor states) why?
people complain that there is no jobs or the money is crap (would you
work for �3 per hour)i would'nt.they said they are calling for skilled
people to come here .
well i can tell you now the building trade is been affected by it
already because they are comin here and under cutting the cost to
carrying out jobs (i know a lot of trade men.this WILL drive wages down
Fact.believe me they have very good skills.
looks like the fifties are happenin here again.
its not about how you are living or what the quality of life you are
living its about how much money can be controlled in this country.
i hear about jews looking .reperation and that people are serious in
considering they claims don't want to seem disrespectful the jews talk
about how many people in how many years.the black race what ha been
happenin to them has happened for generations there is not a livin or
dead person could do the maths on that one.i speak for myself i don't
want any thing ,just want to be treated the way i treat people there
are many like me.when racism is in my face i deal with it trust me but
i will not judge one judge all.
so please do show me all the injusice which has been committed against
this island from others and im sure i will be able to match you
overwhelm you with the smae facts drawn up by the very natives you
speak.
thanks for your comments.


.